The Terra Luna Classic Community's Landmark Decision: Burning 800 Million USTC Tokens

Bombolo | News and Media

In a groundbreaking move, the Terra Luna Classic community has officially approved a proposal to burn a staggering 800 million USTC tokens. This proposal, initiated by the esteemed LUNC community member, Vegas, suggests blacklisting the Ozone Protocol wallet that holds these tokens, effectively freezing them instead of destroying them outright. The community's response to this proposal has been nothing short of extraordinary, with traders reacting immediately to this monumental decision, causing significant price fluctuations within the ecosystem.

Also Read: Terra Luna Classic and the Potential for Massive Gains

Terra Luna Classic's Proposal 11832

The Terra Luna Classic Community Passes 800 Million USTC Burn Proposal

Proposal 11832, titled "Proposal to blacklist wallet TERRA1QYW695VAXJ7JL6S4U564C6XKFE59KERCG0H88W," successfully achieved the "pass threshold" following a resounding "Yes" vote by the top validator, Allnodes. The proposal garnered a 54.07% majority in favor, with 30.51% opposing it, and a further 13.39% expressing dissent with a veto, while 2.03% abstained from voting. The community is currently grappling with the implications of freezing the wallet, as this could potentially result in a significant delay in the token burn process.

Of the 52 validators that participated in the voting process, an equal number, 21, favored and opposed the proposal, while some, including notable validators like Hexxagon, LuncLive, LuncGoblins, and Solidvote, chose to abstain from voting due to the proposal's significance.

Previously, the community had passed proposals aimed at persuading wallet owners to either transfer their USTC tokens to the community pool or burn them directly. Unfortunately, these diplomatic approaches failed, and the L1 development team is now poised to implement the blacklisting process.

Also Read: Should You Invest in LUNC? A Comprehensive Analysis

LUNC and USTC Price Resurgence

LUNC Price Rises Amidst Significant Decision

In the wake of the Terra Luna Classic community's historic decision, both LUNC and USTC prices are showing signs of recovery from the recent selloff experienced in the broader cryptocurrency market. The burning of 800 million USTC tokens is a pivotal development, carrying significant implications for the USTC token's repeg and the revival of LUNC.

LUNC's price surged by 1% in the last 24 hours, with the current trading price standing at $0.000056. The 24-hour price range oscillates between $0.0000556 and $0.0000574. However, it is important to note that the price is still trading below the crucial support level, indicating that further market movements are in store.

Concurrently, USTC is priced at $0.011, demonstrating sideways movement within the past 24 hours. Its 24-hour trading range extends from $0.0109 to $0.0111. The implications of this price movement are closely watched within the Terra Luna Classic community, given the significance of the USTC repeg.

The Terra Luna Classic community's approval of the proposal to burn 800 million USTC tokens represents a significant milestone in the evolution of the project. This decision, although not without its challenges and uncertainties, holds the potential to reshape the ecosystem and breathe new life into the USTC token. As the community moves forward, it remains to be seen how this landmark decision will impact the broader cryptocurrency landscape.

Also Read: Terra Luna Classic: 76 Billion LUNC Tokens Burned


1. What does it mean to "burn" tokens in the cryptocurrency context?
Burning tokens refers to the deliberate and permanent removal of a certain number of tokens from circulation, reducing the overall supply. This can have implications on the token's value and ecosystem.

2. How does the blacklisting of a wallet affect the tokens it holds?
When a wallet is blacklisted, the tokens within it are effectively frozen and cannot be used or transferred. The tokens remain in the wallet but are rendered unusable.

3. Why did some validators choose to abstain from voting on the proposal?
Validators may abstain from voting on significant proposals when they are unsure about the implications or when the decision is particularly divisive. Abstaining ensures neutrality.