BlackRock Delays Spot Bitcoin ETF Bid: Exploring the Potential Reasons

Bombolo | News and Media

In a recent turn of events, BlackRock, a prominent asset management firm, has chosen to delay its re-bid for a spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF). This unexpected delay has sparked speculations among industry experts, prompting a closer examination of the potential reasons behind BlackRock's decision. In this article, we will delve into the three theories put forth by Senior ETF analyst Eric Balchunas from Bloomberg, shedding light on the possible factors influencing BlackRock's hesitation.

The delay in BlackRock's re-bid for a spot Bitcoin ETF has caught the attention of industry observers, prompting discussions regarding the underlying reasons. Let's explore the three theories put forward by Eric Balchunas and gain insights into this intriguing development.

Also Read: Coinbase's Stock Surges 12% Following Spot Bitcoin ETF Partnerships

Theory 1: Technical Delay in Refiling

Eric Balchunas suggests that BlackRock may have already refiled its proposal but is facing a technical delay in updating the Nasdaq website, which could explain the lack of public acknowledgment. It is plausible that the delay in public confirmation is due to administrative factors rather than a change in BlackRock's stance.

Theory 2: Enhanced Surveillance-Sharing Agreement (SSA) Details

The second theory, considered particularly intriguing by Balchunas, revolves around the inclusion of more comprehensive surveillance-sharing agreement (SSA) details. While some firms have merely replaced "Crypto Exchange" with "Coinbase" in their refilings, the Wall Street Journal's report hints at the SEC staff's desire for "clarity and comprehensiveness." This implies that the regulator seeks additional information, potentially leading to BlackRock's delay as they aim to provide the necessary transparency.

Also Read: BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF Application: Reshaping the Crypto Market's Future

Theory 3: Competition and ARK Invest's Performance

The third theory revolves around the remarkable performance of ARK Invest, which filed for a Bitcoin ETF in April and has since gained significant traction. Balchunas, however, deems it unlikely that BlackRock lost interest solely due to ARK Invest's success. As a leading asset management firm, BlackRock likely anticipated the competition and should have formulated their bid strategy accordingly.

Impact on the Crypto Market

Irrespective of the specific reason behind the delay, the SEC's recent communication with exchanges regarding unclear and insufficiently exhaustive bids for spot Bitcoin ETFs has led to a shakeout in the crypto market. Other notable companies, including Fidelity, Invesco, VanEck, and WisdomTree, have refiled their proposals, explicitly listing Coinbase as their exchange SSA partner. This increased scrutiny and competition highlight the significance of fulfilling regulatory requirements for any potential Bitcoin ETF issuer.

BlackRock's decision to delay its re-bid for a spot Bitcoin ETF has generated curiosity within the industry. While the exact rationale remains unknown, theories proposed by Eric Balchunas shed light on potential factors, including technical delays, enhanced surveillance-sharing agreement details, and the competitive landscape. The repercussions of this delay, along with the SEC's focus on regulatory compliance, have prompted other companies to reassess their proposals and refile with more comprehensive information.

Also Read: The Battle for Approval: Will BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF Secure SEC Approval?


  1. Q1: Is BlackRock's delay related to technical issues?
    A: It is possible that BlackRock has already refiled its proposal but is facing a technical delay in updating the Nasdaq website, resulting in the lack of public acknowledgment.
  2. Q2: What is the significance of enhanced surveillance-sharing agreement details?
    A: The inclusion of comprehensive surveillance-sharing agreement (SSA) details reflects the SEC's desire for transparency and clarity in Bitcoin ETF proposals.
  3. Q3: Did BlackRock lose interest due to competition from ARK Invest?
    A: While ARK Invest's success in filing for a Bitcoin ETF is noteworthy, it is unlikely to be the sole reason for BlackRock's delay, as they would have anticipated competition in the market.
  4. Q4: How has the delay impacted the crypto market?
    A: The delay, along with the SEC's focus on regulatory compliance, has prompted other companies like Fidelity, Invesco, VanEck, and WisdomTree to refine and refile their proposals, resulting in increased competition and scrutiny.
  5. Q5: What should potential Bitcoin ETF issuers consider?
    A: Potential Bitcoin ETF issuers should prioritize fulfilling regulatory requirements and providing comprehensive information to ensure their proposals meet the SEC's standards.